Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Allen, M. (2013). Robert Gottlieb. Great Expectations: the Sons and Daughters of Charles Dickens. Dickens Quarterly, 30(1), 69-72.
The journal explores the resentment that Charles Dickens felt as a result of the conflict he had with how he was raised in a Victorian household and the interactions he had with actual people. The text will be of great essence in exploring the social world of Charles Dickens as it entails the theme, setting, and characters based on events and family members with whom Dickens interacted.
Andrews, A. B. (2012). Charles Dickens, a social worker in his time. Social Work, 57(4), 297-307.
The article presents a strong argument on the impact Dickens had on social justice. In the article, Andrews points out the need for members in the working class to recognize their worldview and apply it in their professional lens, which is the need for reform. The need for reform explored in the article aligns itself with Dickens’ life-long passion for reforms. The stance presented in the text would be of great essence as it will compliment my argument that everything which Dickens wrote entailed a social motive.
Arneson, R. J. (1978). Benthamite Utilitarianism and Hard Times. Philosophy and Literature, 2(1), 60-75.
In the text, Arneson disapproves the notion that Dickens was a fierce opponent of utilitarianism. The philosophy of love and compassion of Dickens differed with that of utilitarianism only in the method. Moreover, Arneson explores Dickens’s view of what drives humans. The article would be used to indicate how Dickens viewed self-interest as an aspect that governed our social relationships and the perception of an individual as good or bad.
Dahmane, R. (1998). Memory, mimicry, and the vindications of ventriloquism in Dickens’ Hard Times. The Psychohistory Review, 27(1), 37.
The article explores the experiences that Dickens underwent during childhood. Dahmane acclaims that the autobiography of Dickens emanates through the text as Bounderbay. The article would be incorporated as it provides more background on the life of Dickens childhood as well as an explanation of Dickens’ deep belief in compassion for the weak.
Engel, M. (1956). The politics of Dickens’ novels. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 945-974.
The text is a reflection of Dickens’ political stand. Engel explores the anti-establishment nature of Dickens. From the text, it is evident that Dickens viewed the representative government as a failure and was against the class structure. Moreover, the article explores how Dickens was disgusted by the evil associated with the pursuit of money. The text would be used to point out Dickens’ interactions, the social realm and the leadership of society.
Garnett, R. (2013). Michael Slater. The Great Charles Dickens Scandal. Dickens Quarterly, 30(1), 66-69.
The text explores the perception of marriage in the Victorian period. From the article, it is evident that marriage preserved an individual’s image in society as Dickens’ case, where despite having an extramarital affair with Ellen Ternan, Dickens went great lengths to conceal the relationship. The article would be used in exploring the influence of the society in the marriage spectrum.
Lindsay, J. (1950). Charles Dickens: A Biographical and Critical Study. Andrew Dakers.
The book explores Dickens life’s critical bibliography as it entails details on Dickens’ family history and his works. The text would be of great essence in my research as it would be used to indicate how Charles Dickens incorporated aspects of his life in his literal works as the case of ‘Great Expectations.’
Perkin, J. R. (2017). John Lanchester’s Capital: A Dickensian Examination of the Condition of England. Journal of Modern Literature, 41(1), 100-117.
The text presents the notion that Dickens laid out the foundation of many social movements and literal works pertaining to social class. The text discusses the effect of Dickens’ time transcendent legacy. The text would be used to address the effectiveness of Dickens in addressing social issues in society through the usage of literal devices that are allegory and metaphors.
Spector, S. J. (1984). Monsters of Metonymy: Hard Times and knowing the working class. ELH, 51(2), 365-384.
The text presents Dickens’s presentation of the working class. The article argues that Dickens depends on his rhetorical capability to convey realism pertaining to the working class instead of carrying out research. The article presents the notion that Dickens had the desire to represent the working class. The article would be used in addressing Dickens’s will to explore aspects of the society.
Wolfreys, J. (2012). Dickens’s London: perception, subjectivity and phenomenal urban multiplicity. Edinburgh University Press.
The article presents the notion that Dickens entailed two identities that were intertwined. This presents itself by the manner in which Wolfreys depicts Dickens as a materialist historiographer for London. Dickens addressed the issue of class in society by criticizing the aspect, but how he leads his life presents a different scenario. The article would be used in the text to indicate that despite Dickens agenda not being clear, he was useful in making a huge impact on the globe.
References
- Allen, M. (2013). Robert Gottlieb. Great Expectations: the Sons and Daughters of Charles Dickens. Dickens Quarterly, 30(1), 69-72.
- Andrews, A. B. (2012). Charles Dickens, social worker in his time. Social work, 57(4), 297-307.
- Arneson, R. J. (1978). Benthamite Utilitarianism and Hard Times. Philosophy and Literature, 2(1), 60-75.
- Dahmane, R. (1998). Memory, mimicry, and the vindications of ventriloquism in Dickens’ Hard Times. The Psychohistory Review, 27(1), 37.
- Engel, M. (1956). The politics of Dickens’ novels. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 945-974.
- Garnett, R. (2013). Michael Slater. The Great Charles Dickens Scandal. Dickens Quarterly, 30(1), 66-69.
- Lindsay, J. (1950). Charles Dickens: A Biographical and Critical Study. Andrew Dakers.
- Perkin, J. R. (2017). John Lanchester’s Capital: A Dickensian Examination of the Condition of England. Journal of Modern Literature, 41(1), 100-117.
- Spector, S. J. (1984). Monsters of Metonymy: Hard Times and knowing the working class. ELH, 51(2), 365-384.
- Wolfreys, J. (2012). Dickens’s London: perception, subjectivity and phenomenal urban multiplicity. Edinburgh University Press.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.