Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
A conflicting topic the U.S. has faced is its decision over the use of Drone strikes. For many decades the U.S. condemned the use of targeted killing. Until historical events occurred, the debate over the circumstances in which the use of lethal forces may be used towards organizations such as terrorists from foreign territories has set an example for the U.S. drone strike decision. Therefore, the following paper will give an overview of political drone history, explore the views and viewpoints towards the justification of the U.S. drone strikes considering both positions and review evidence.
Since the advancement in technology as well as military artillery, drones have begun to be a controversial topic. Drone strikes are defined as an aerial attack by one or more unmanned aerial vehicles usually, releasing an attack towards a target. The controversial drone strike topic must be addressed with certainty to protect the interest of the United States, continuing to support an effective global war on terror. Countries such as the United States as well as several other European nations use drones on a large scale to conduct precise strikes against terrorist targets. Multiple high-profile terrorist leaders have been killed by drones since the September 11 attacks ( Pros and Cons ).
The justification for the use of drone strikes is allowed when involved during an armed conflict as well as lawful when an imminent threat is done towards the nations national security. American targeted drone strikes are in compliance with international law, more in particular with the law known as the law of war. Which requires minimization of harm toward the civilian population from a combatant. The United States has done great care to adhere to the principles of targeting only those combatants including those in foreign affairs, along with the care of avoiding any maximization of civilian casualties and keeping it to a minimum or to none.
Drone strikes remain a very controversial issue around the world, but domestically these assets are widely supported all over the political spectrum. A recent poll showed that 61 percent of Americans are in favor of drones being used to eliminate terrorist threats in nations such as Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan ( Pros and Cons ). Both parties also show majority support with 69 percent of Republicans and 59 percent of Democrats in favor of the use of drone assets. To put this in perspective, the current approval rating of President Obama is around 42 percent( Gallup ).
The main controversy that comes with using these assets is the number of civilian deaths that occur during drone strikes. Many civilians, including children, have been killed due to strikes from UAVs(Unmanned Aerial Vehicles). This is generally due to their proximity to a terrorist target( Under Drones ).
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.